BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20251016T135143Z
LOCATION:Riverside East
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20251015T173000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20251015T183000
UID:HFESAM_ASPIRE 2025_sess138_POST174@linklings.com
SUMMARY:CANCELED - Use of a Monocular Head-Worn Display in Lieu of a Head-
 Up Display for Commercial Aircraft Approach and Landing with an Enhanced F
 light Vision System: Considerations for Safety and Usability
DESCRIPTION:David Newton and Theodore Mofle (Federal Aviation Administrati
 on) and Farzaneh Shahini, Inchul Choi, and Hanna Forbat (Cherokee Nation 3
 -S)\n\nIn this study, an experiment was carried out to determine whether p
 ilot performance, workload, and pilot-reported usability during an SA CAT 
 I approach and landing differed as a function of whether they flew with a 
 HUD or with a monocular HWD, as well as whether there were differential ef
 fects on these outcomes depending on whether the display presented Enhance
 d Flight Vision System (EFVS) imagery or whether it presented basic flight
  symbology only. Eleven Part 121 flight crews flew daytime and nighttime S
 A CAT I approach and landing scenarios using a HUD and a monocular HWD wit
 h and without an EFVS in the FAA’s Boeing 737 Level D-equivalent simulator
 . The findings of the study suggest that a monocular HWD may not have a si
 gnificant negative impact on a pilot’s ability to manage most aspects of t
 he flightpath during a routine SA CAT I operation; however, the monocular 
 HWD elevated pilot workload. Pilots reported that the EFVS enhanced their 
 awareness of the runway environment when transitioning from instrument to 
 visual flight references; however, it was reported to be a hindrance when 
 transitioning to flare, landing, and rollout regardless of whether it was 
 implemented on a HUD or a monocular HWD.\n\n
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
